Appearing at Admission Test for the Second Time
I strongly disagree with the statement for a number of reasons. Firstly, education is the fundamental right of a student. No student should be deprived of this basic right. So if a student is not allowed to appear at admission test for the second time, he/she will be deprived (বঞ্চিত) of his/her right to education. A student may not succeed at admission test for the first time. But as there is enough possibility (সম্ভাবনা) of his/her succeeding for the second time, appearing at the admission test for the second time should not be banned (নিষিদ্ধ).
Secondly, if the students are deprived of this opportunity, our country will surely be deprived of the services of innumerable (অসংখ্য) brilliant students who might be good doctors, engineers, professors and civil or military officers if they were given the opportunity to appear at admission test for the second time. Therefore, appearing at admission test for the second time should not be prohibited (নিষিদ্ধ ).
Finally, education should not be restricted to any particular (নির্দিষ্ট) age. Everybody should be given opportunity to receive education at any age. If a student has an aim to be an engineer and if he/she studies attentively and diligently (পরিশ্রমের সাথে), he/she will surely succeed either at first admission test or at second admission test. We should remember that failure is the pillar of success. So the authorities (কর্তৃপক্ষ) concerned (সংশ্লিষ্ট) should not ban the students from appearing at admission test for the second time.
To sum up, as education is a person's birth right, he/she should be given as many opportunities as he/she needs in order to ensure (নিশ্চিত করা) his/her birth right.